Elmbridge lab sets quantum stability record: what it means, and what it does not

Physicists kept 24 fragile qubits stable for 1.8 seconds, a leap for research, but experts say practical quantum computers are still years away.

Scientists in clean-room suits working at a laser setup, with a city view at sunset Higgsfield AI

In a clean room on the top floor of Elmbridge University’s physics building, researchers in white suits move between lasers and vacuum chambers. Here, a small team has set a new record in one of the hardest problems in computing: keeping quantum information alive.

The group reported that it kept a set of 24 qubits in a stable quantum state for an average of 1.8 seconds, roughly three times longer than its previous best. The results were published this week after review by independent scientists.

Why stability matters

Ordinary computers store information as bits that are either 0 or 1. Quantum computers use qubits, which can hold a combination of both states at once and can be linked together in ways that have no everyday equivalent. In principle, this allows certain calculations to be done far faster than on any conventional machine.

The catch is that qubits are extraordinarily fragile. Tiny vibrations, heat or stray electromagnetic fields can destroy their quantum state within fractions of a second, a process called decoherence. The longer qubits stay stable, the more operations a machine can run before errors pile up.

The Elmbridge team traps individual atoms with laser beams inside a vacuum and shields them with a redesigned system of magnetic coils and vibration dampers, which the researchers say was the key to the improvement.

We did not build a faster computer. We built a quieter room for the qubits to live in. That sounds modest, but it is exactly what the field needs.

Amara Okonkwo, physicist and leader of the research team

What it does not mean

Add News to your preferred sources on Google.

Trust and transparency

Published
Updated
Author
Samuel Price
Revision history
  • — Story updated.
  • — Article first published.

If you spot an error, let us know. We publish corrections clearly and visibly.

Comments 0

Write a comment

Join the discussion

Sign in or create a free account to comment.

Sign in Create free account

More news

In other news…

More news